Im not sure about you guys but i have seen video reviews of MS, some reviewers post updates after a year or two (sp4). They seem satisfied.
"How do they have better QC if we haven’t seen Eve’s yet? "
So far for V, we have seen reviews with mixed feedback. Battery life/speakers/screen bleeding etc. MS who has been creating surface for few years VS Eve V with mixed reviews so far. (i know Eve sent some cosmetic or minor fault device to reviewers, but i dont think Eve knew what was up with half the problems reviewers discovered.)
you basically pointed out what i tried to say. A start up with no track record of QC or after care. I probably could have reword it better but i think you get my point.
P.s there was a post about Reviewers having wrong screen calibration and only was discovered from reviewers themselves. i wouldn’t call that great QC.